[mew-int 00629] Re: <DEL> behaviour
sen_ml at example.com
sen_ml at example.com
Thu Dec 13 09:59:31 JST 2001
From: Werner LEMBERG <wl at example.com>
Subject: [mew-int 00626] Re: <DEL> behaviour
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 09:00:26 +0100 (CET)
...
> I draw the same conclusion, but I was pretending to be a dumb
> user :-)
;-)
> Is it possible to redefine mew-mark-afterstep-spec so that the
> symbols `mew-mark-review' etc. are visible with C-h v?
This would be a good question for the Mew development team!
> > 3. The level of the new mark is greater than that of the old
> > one.
>
> Here a definition of `level' is missing.
Yes.
Since there is a section on mark level in the info files, may be a
link from the docstring to it would be appropriate. The info node is
`mark level:: Mark strength', which may be found in the `marks:: Funny
marks' section of the Mew info files.
<digression + speculation>
The current method available for configuration exposes a user to quite
a lot of complexity and internal detail. I mean, the original
question was just about changing the behavior of the movement of the
cursor after the delete mark had been placed on a message, right?
I get the feeling that from a user-perspective, it'd be nicer to be
able to configure mark properties via some "easier" interface. There
could be functions such as `mew-mark-set-property' and
`mew-mark-get-property'. I don't know about whether there's much of a
demand for this sort of functionality though, not to mention the
additional code, complexity, and maintenance issues that may result...
</digression + speculation>
> > 4. The old and new marks have the same level, the old mark has
> > state, and the old mark has been overridden.
>
> A definition of `state' should also be given.
I confess I didn't know what `state' meant here -- I just tried to
massage the existing docstring ;-)
My guess would be that `state' is an attribute of each type of mark.
Based on the definition of `mew-mark-spec', it looks like among the
standard mark types there is only one type (refile) that has state so
far.
More information about the Mew-int
mailing list