[mew-int 00480] Re: Mew 2.0.52 -> 2.0.1

[Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker]

From: Kazu Yamamoto <kazu at example.com>

kazu> From: Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker <levitte at example.com>
kazu> Subject: Re: [mew-int 00473] Mew 2.0.52 -> 2.0.1
kazu> 
kazu> > That's some very confusing version number jumps.  Surely you mean 2.1
kazu> > instead of 2.0.1?
kazu> 
kazu> There are two branches, stable and beta. {0..49} belong to stable
kazu> while {50..} belong to beta.
kazu> 
kazu> stable: 2.0 -> 2.0.1 -> 2.0.2 ...
kazu>             |
kazu> beta  :     +-> 2.0.50 -> 2.0.51 .... -> 2.1
kazu> 
kazu> # repeat this cycle

OK, I understand your definitin.  It still is a small pain to have
chronology detected from version numbers...  Oh well.

-- 
Richard Levitte   \ Spannvägen 38, II \ LeViMS at example.com
Redakteur at example.com  \ S-168 35  BROMMA  \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
                    \      SWEDEN       \ or +46-733-72 88 11
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis                -- poei at example.com
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
Software Engineer, GemPlus:             http://www.gemplus.com/

Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.