[mew-int 00851] Re: Saving attachment mail (one more)
Arnaud Vandyck
arnaud.vandyck at example.com
Sat Apr 27 01:02:01 JST 2002
Tatsuya Kinoshita <tats at example.com> wrote:
> In message [mew-int 00843], on Tue, 16 Apr 2002,
> Tatsuya Kinoshita <tats at example.com> wrote:
>
> > However, part-3.1, 3.2, 3.3 are not extracted even if a part is
> > Message/Rfc822. It's a problem, I think. I know that Mailman
> > uses this format for a digest mail.
> >
> > And also, I hope to extract a single message by `C-u B'.
> >
> > I planned this feature, but I've not implemented it yet...
>
> I've done it. See the patch that is attached to this mail.
>
> Now I can extract part-3.1, 3.2, ... from Mailman's digest mail
> by `B' or `C-u B'.
>
> Note: If part-3 is CT: Message/Rfc822 (not Multipart/*),
> part-3.1, 3.2, ... are not extracted.
Tatsuya,
I did apply your patch but I still got some surprises:
1) On a multipart/Rfc822 part-x.y, Mew fails to extract parts;
2) On a multipart/Rfc822 part-x, Mew extracts _all_ the parts ('B'
or 'C-u B'). (what is the difference between 'B' and 'C-u B'?)
Well, I still use Mew. I did try Sylpheed and it's great, but not so
great that Mew :-)
Last, I did apply the patch by hand (patch command fails
(mew-2.2-3.deb)) and look at the code: I did not understand a thing!
Lisp looks like a very special language! :-)
Respect! :-)
-- arnaud :: http://vbstefi60.fapse.ulg.ac.be/~arnaud/
More information about the Mew-int
mailing list