[mew-int 01183] Re: limitations on character usage in config names?

[Kazu Yamamoto ( 山本和彦 )]

From: sen_ml at example.com
Subject: [mew-int 01175] limitations on character usage in config names?

> I have not been able to access $inbox for one of my cases, while I am
> able to access $inbox for a different case.  FWIW, I am able to invoke
> "i" for both cases and I was able to use +mdrop for both immediately
> prior to upgrading to 3.1.

Did you specify the case like "case:$inbox"?

i.e. "g" + "case:$inbox"

> At this point, the only idea that comes to mind is that the case that
> doesn't work uses the character "@" in the case name, while the one
> for which it does work does not use "@" in the case name.  A wild
> guess, perhaps (-;

With the currect spec, case should be in the form of
"[-a-zA-Z0-9_][-a-zA-Z0-9_]+".

Some people want to loose this spec. More discussions are necessary I
guess.

--Kazu