[mew-int 2765] Re: Mew 6.3 release candidate 2

[Kazu Yamamoto ( 山本和彦 )]

> This is not immediate.  For example the presence of "½¤" selects
> iso-8859-7 (which is fine).  If I used 3/4 instead of 1/4, then euc-kr
> would have been chosen.  This is OK for me but it is not following the
> above rule.

Is euc-kr chosen for a real message (not for a short test message)?
Again, Emacs 23 has LESS information than Emacs 22. So, perfect
backward compatibility is not possible. If things goes well in REAL
life (not in a corner case), I think it is fine.

--Kazu