[mew-int 00531] Re: mew-pop message wording inquiry

sen_ml at example.com sen_ml at example.com
Mon Oct 29 19:21:10 JST 2001


From: Kazu Yamamoto (山本和彦) <kazu at example.com>
Subject: [mew-int 00528] Re: mew-pop message wording inquiry
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 18:45:15 +0900 (JST)

...

> > P.S. On a slightly different note, I think "5 messages retrieved" is
> >      preferable to "5 messages have been received".
> 
> Would you please explain why?

Sure.  Here are a few reasons:

  1) I believe the word "retrieved" is more commonly used in the
     context of a user invoking the action of downloading mail from a
     server than the phrase "have been received".  Perhaps other
     English speakers may disagree, but that has been my experience.

  2) A user will see the message in question after invoking
     `mew-summary-retrieve' -- since the user has invoked a
     "retrieval" operation, seeing it reported as completed in the
     form of "retrieved" seems quite natural.  Other ways to phrase
     the message might be "retrieval completed" or "retrieval of 5
     message completed", but then the messages are getting a bit long.

  3) In the context of novice users who might be confused about
     "left", it seems likely to me that they may not understand where
     the messages are left -- cf. Tak Ota's discussion.  Consequently,
     it does not seem unreasonable to suppose that such people might
     also be confused by where message "have been received" to.

Is this clear?




More information about the Mew-int mailing list